Legal Opinion
La Hay, Inc. v. Paths Exchange, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
We find that there is an executed document which may become an executed contract and an arbitrable controversy which is subject to a declaratory judgment; but we find reasons, for our conclusion which are not announced in the record. Article seventeenth of the contract reads as follows •
“ Pictures Not Generally Released.
“ Seventeenth. If any one or more of said motion pictures excepting the motion pictures which may be ‘ roadshown ’ shall not be generally released by the Distributor for distribution in the United States during the period beginning May 1st, 1930, and ending August 31st, 1931,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Peter Cooper's Glue FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Loeb v. . WillisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Willetts v. . the Sun Mutual Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bank of Madison v. GraberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Schwartz v. LeibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Sussman v. GoldbergNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Zurich Insurance v. EvansCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977
- Freidberg v. FreidbergNew York Supreme Court · 1960