Legal Opinion
In re Forbes' Will
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided July 31, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Probate of will of Charles A. Forbes, deceased. Denied.
1Opinion of the Court
Eggleston, S.
—The alleged will of Charles A. Forbes, deceased, offered for probate in the Surrogate’s Court of Cortland County, bears date on the 1st day of September, 1883. Under this will, William A. Bean, the petitioner, was named as executoit The will appears to have been executed in compliance with the statutory requirements sufficient to admit the same to probate. Upon the return to- the citation issued, Pauline B. Forbes, the widow of testator, and Annis R. Forbes and Mabel Forbes, daughters, by their special guardian, interposed objections to the probate of the mil upon, the following…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Collyer v. . CollyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- In Re the Probate of the Alleged Last Will & Testament of StickneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- In re the Estate of BrookmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895
- In re the Will of GregoryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1896
- In re Philp's WillNew York Supreme Court · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blackett v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Collins v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- In re the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- In re StickneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898