Legal Opinion

Edmonds Sch. Dist. v. A.T.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 7, 2017No. Cause No. C16–1500RSLPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on "Plaintiff Edmond School District's Motion for Summary Judgment" (Dkt. # 13) and defendants' cross-motion (Dkt. # 14). The school district appeals an administrative *1137decision that it is financially responsible under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"), 20 U.S.C. § 1400, et seq. , for the costs associated with A.T.'s placement in a residential facility. The district maintains that the placement was necessitated by A.T.'s medical condition, not his educational needs, and is therefore not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Forest Grove School District v. T. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Alexander Kerkam v. Floretta McKenzie Superintendent, D.C. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. C.B. Ex Rel. Baquerizo v. Garden Grove Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Ashland School District v. Parents of Student E.H.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. K.C. as guardian on behalf of minor G.C. v. EVERETT PUBLIC SCHOOLSDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API