Legal Opinion

Branton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 18, 2016No. 5D15-2405PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.-

Donald Branton petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, asserting that he received ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal following resentencing. Branton alleges that, at his resentencing hearing, the court denied him due process and, therefore, committed fundamental error by refusing to consider his evidence of rehabilitation or mitigation prior to imposing sentence. Branton contends that this error should have been raised by appellate counsel on direct appeal. We agree and grant the writ.

In 2002, following a jury trial, Branton was convicted. of robbery with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Rutherford v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Pope v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. JESSICA SERNA v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Strong v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Andrews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API