Legal Opinion · Dissent

AIRWORK SER. DIV., ETC. v. Director, Div. of Taxation

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 23, 1984Published

1DissentGaribaldi, J.

It is the part of a good shepherd to shear the flock, not flay it. [Tiberius Caesar, A.D. 25.]

Justice Frankfurter once noted that “[e]ven tax administration does not as a matter of principle preclude considerations of fairness.” Angelus Milling Co. v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 325 U.S. 293, 297, 65 S.Ct. 1162, 1165, 89 L.Ed. 1619, 1623 (1945). Today’s decision loses sight of the need for fairness. It *303allows the Division of Taxation (Division), long after the transactions in question were closed, to extract from Airwork Service Division (Airwork) sales taxes that the Division itself informed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Untermyer v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API