The Flushing
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeals from the District Court of the United States from the Eastern District of New York. These causes come here upon appeals from decrees of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, dividing damages and costs in a case of towage. The opinion of the court below is reported in 134 Fed. 757.
1Per curiam
The opinion of the court below fully and accurately states the facts whereon it reached the conclusion that the libel-ants’ barges were negligent in not providing themselves with anchors, and that, in such cases, it was the custom of the tug to furnish an anchor for her tows, and that the tug was negligent in leaving the barges witli an insufficient anchor, and that, if the captain of the barge Rogers was negligent in paying out the line of the anchor which was furnished by the tug, this was the negligence of the tug. The libelants have not appealed, and the faults charged against the tug by…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Tug Christine MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- The LyndhurstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corporation v. Tug Christine MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Barber v. Home Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1907