Johnson's Estate v. Poindexter
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtPannidl, C. J.
The purpose of this suit is the probate of the last will and testament of Mary Johnson. On the trial in the district court in response to a special verdict to the effect 'that, at the time of the execution of the will, the testatrix, was wanting in testamentary capacity and that the execution of the will had been procured by- undue influence practiced upon the said deceased by her son Will Johnson, judgment was entered refusing the application to probate the will.
The judgment of the trial court is attacked on the ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the evidence. Reversible…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co v. GormleyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Millican v. MillicanTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Craycroft v. CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Jamison v. DooleyTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Clark v. BrileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. PoindexterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Douglas v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Johnson v. PoindexterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Johnson v. PoindexterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927