Legal Opinion

Martinsen v. Ford Motor Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1934No. Civ. No. 8562PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Defendants’ demurrers to plaintiffs’ second amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend on May 24, 1932. On May 27th plaintiffs gave notice of appeal “from the ruling of the court in sustaining demurrers of defendants to second amended complaint without leave to amend”. On May 31st the trial judge signed the judgment in favor of defendants. On June 2d plaintiffs again gave notice of appeal, not from the judgment but from the ruling sustaining the demurrers.

*735Following the filing of briefs herein respondents moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cornic v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Christensen v. Lucerne Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Sturgeon v. City of HawthorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zimmer Construction Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API