Legal Opinion
State v. Deschambault
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided May 17, 1963No. 3811PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, C. J.
This indictment for cheating by false pretenses brought under R. S., c. 133, § 11, is before us on exceptions to the overruling of defendant’s demurrer. The indictment reads in part:
Alleged False Pretense
"... that Clement H. Deschambault . . . designedly, by false token and with intent to defraud, ... in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Biddeford, Maine, did pretend that he was authorized by the City of Biddeford, Maine, to purchase for and receive articles of merchandise on behalf of the City of Biddeford, Maine; and, on said seventeenth day of October, 1961, the said Clement H.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. StroutSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
- Morse v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Commonwealth v. LangleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Thompson v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1883
- State v. KerrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Polisher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- State v. JalbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- Driver v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Driver v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.