Legal Opinion

Hartel v. Kobb

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1956Published

1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.

Plaintiff in an action on a promissory note moves for summary judgment. The answer admits the making of a note for $40,000, which on its face provided for interest of 4% per annum, but alleges a superseding oral agreement to pay interest of $100 per week plus 3% per annum, which, constituting usury, is a complete defense. In support of his motion plaintiff charges that he was unrepresented by counsel when the agreements were made and that defendant’s attorney not only prepared the note but was custodian of certain collateral which he surrendered without protest to plaintiff when informed of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haviland v. . WilletsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Gilleran v. ColbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API