Legal Opinion
Centennial Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Dave Schneider, Doing Business as Dave Schneider Wholesale Jewelry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 26, 1957No. 15337PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONE, Circuit Judge.
Centennial Insurance Co. (hereinafter “Centennial”), defendant below, appeals from a judgment entered by the District Court. The action was brought by Dave Schneider, doing business as Dave Schneider Wholesale Jewelry, to recover on a policy of insurance issued by Centennial to appellee on August 15, 1954, and continuing in force for a period of one year. The claimed loss of jewelry and their carrying cases allegedly covered by the policy occurred on December 3,1954.
On the morning of December 3, 1954, at about 10:00 A.M. appellee left his place of business. As a wholesale…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. One 1950 Buick Sedan, Serial No. 56272505Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- James G. Smyth, Collector of Internal Revenue v. Mazie Erickson, of the Last Will and Testament of Timothy H. Carlon, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Princess Ring Co., Inc. v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932
- Greenberg v. Rhode Island InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Nissel v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Commercial Coin Co. v. North River Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1967
- EMMI INC. v. Zurich American Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002