Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Franklin and Marshall College
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 29, 1985No. 84-1739PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
This court must decide whether the district court erred in requiring Franklin and Marshall College (“College”) to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) which compels disclosure of confidential peer review material. The College and the amici curiae urge adoption of a qualified academic peer review privilege which, if properly applied to the facts at issue, would protect, they argue, the confidential material from the agency’s subpoena. After careful consideration of all matters raised by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. University of Pennsylvania. Appeal of the Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Dixon v. Rutgers, the State University of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Al-Khazraji v. Saint Francis CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Virmani v. Novant Health Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.