Legal Opinion
Meade v. St. Louis Mutual Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1875PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPratt, J.
— The plaintiff took out a policy of life insurance in the St. Louis Mutual Life Insurance Company, in a certain class or department known as the army and navy branch. The object of forming this branch was to induce officers of the army and navy to insure in the company.
The company is a foreign corporation created under the laws of the state of Missouri, but at the time of the issuing *2of the policy to the plaintiff it had an agency in the city of Mew York, had complied with our statutes regulating the business of insurance by foreign companies, and had received a license to do business from…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Miller v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Cohen v. . N.Y. Mutual Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Dubois v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1830
- Abbot v. American Hard Rubber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1861
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Van Werden v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Suess v. Imperial Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Whiting v. DerrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Koerner v. HennAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Barden v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.