Legal Opinion
Defenders of Wildlife v. Hull
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 13, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 99-0624Published
1Opinion of the Court
18 P.3d 722 (2001)
199 Ariz. 411
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, a nonprofit corporation; James A. Slingluff; Timothy J. Flood; and Joanne Finch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
State of Arizona, Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Governor Jane Dee HULL, Defendant-Appellee,
Phelps Dodge Corporation; Salt River Valley Water Users Association; Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Intervenors-Appellees.
No. 1 CA-CV 99-0624.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.
February 13, 2001.
Arizona Center For Law In The Public Interest, by Timothy M. Hogan, Tina A. Calos, Jennifer B. Anderson,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.