Legal Opinion

Midonick v. Peppertree Hill DevelOpment Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 25, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 29,1975 granting plaintiffs’ motion for a rehearing and upon rehearing, denying defendants’ motion for a change of venue from New York County to Kings or Queens County (or any other county in the Second Department) unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements to respondents. The record does not indicate that "there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had in the proper county”. (CPLR 510, subd 2.) Plaintiff’s (Millard L. Midonick) official position in New York County does not in and of itself justify an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lent v. RyderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Ingo v. CaseyNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Ingo v. CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rothwax v. Spice-handlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Cohen v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services ex rel. Edward P. v. Edward O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Palma v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API