Wheeler v. State

In appealing his conviction for entering with intent to commit a felony and assault and battery with intent to commit a felony, the defendant-appellant, Wheeler, raises four issues which are:

1. Was the out of court identification procedure so suggestive as to make the in-court identification inadmissible ;

2. Was there sufficient evidence to convict;

3. Did Wheeler receive a fair trial after a sworn juror admitted knowing one of the complaining witnesses; and

*524. Was there error in allowing a portion of a police report into evidence?

We find no reversible error and accordingly affirm the judgment…