Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Benson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1985No. 84-539PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On preliminary consideration, we granted the State's petition for writ of certiorari because, under the facts as presented by the petition pursuant to A.R.A.P. 39 (k), it appeared that the Defendant may have waived his right to arraignment. Our careful review of the record, however, reveals that the Court of Criminal Appeals correctly concluded that Defendant raised this issue during trial and that the trial court's subsequent erroneous reference to the Defendant's plea of guilty without further objection did not constitute a waiver of his procedural right to be furnished a copy of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  2. Lawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  3. Hovater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API