Heldman v. Uniroyal, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKrbnzler, J.
On March 21, 1973, plaintiff-appellee, Julie M. Heldman, hereinafter referred to as the appellee, filed a complaint against the defendant-appellant, Uniroyal, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the appellant.
In her principal claim for relief she alleged that one of the appellant’s divisions marketed and sold a special synthetic rubber material which was claimed to be suitable for use as an outdoor tennis court surface and that this surface is known as the “Uniroyal Roll-A-Way Tennis Court.” She alleged that the appellant made certain representations and warranties, both express and implied,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Briere v. Lathrop Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Boles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Polster v. Griff's of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Ohio Power Co. v. DillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Maddox v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- State ex rel. Elsass v. Shelby County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Harris v. Utah Transit AuthorityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Thomas v. Holliday by and Through HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.