Legal Opinion

Pegues v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided June 21, 2011No. 2010-CP-00744-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Charles “Ducky” Pegues challenges his conviction for possession of cocaine. On the first day of trial, Pegues pled guilty to the crime. But five years later, he filed a motion for post-conviction relief (PCR) because his indictment failed to charge it was being brought in Lafayette County. The circuit court denied Pegues’s PCR motion without an evidentiary hearing.

¶ 2. On appeal, Pegues argues he is entitled to collateral relief for three reasons— (1) his indictment was fatally defective; (2) his attorney’s performance was deficient; and (3) his guilty plea was…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. Thomas C. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. Reynolds v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. United States v. Bennie Ray Winship, A/K/A Nip, and Jerry BiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  2. Damien Townsend a/k/a Damien Omar Townsend v. State of Mississippi;Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019
  3. Devonta Pipkin v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API