Legal Opinion
United States v. F/n/u Pate, A/K/A "Tush Hog", and Jerry Edward Pate
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 13, 1976No. 76-1407PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:
Eddie Wayne Pate and Jerry Edward Pate, defendants below, urge several points of error from their conviction for conspiracy to violate the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 371, 1 and for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. 2 After closely examining all of defendants’ contentions, we find them to be without merit, and accordingly, we affirm.
Jerry Edward Pate raises only one claim of error. He argues that it was reversible error for the District Court to allow the United States Attorney to exhibit a document to the Government witness for the purpose of refreshing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- John Benson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Henry Walker, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Thomas A. Warren, John L. Warren, Jr., Des. E. Schick and David DefinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Tompkins v. CyrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- United States v. Joseph Gironda, John Heckens, John Speiss, and John BalzanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.