Legal Opinion
Mohmed v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 16, 1998No. 2-96-466-CRPublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIVINGSTON, Justice.
The trial court convicted Donald Allen Mohmed of possession of marihuana and, finding the enhancement allegation to be true, assessed punishment at eleven years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. He complains of the legal sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction because he claims there was no evidence linking him to the marihuana. Also, appellant challenges the denial of his motion to suppress because he claims there was no reasonable suspicion to support a canine sniff of the car he was driving. Because we find that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- McQuarters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Powell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
- Josey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Haas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Goudeau v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.