Legal Opinion
Clark v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 12, 1968No. 43289, 43290PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
1. The complaint adequately stated a claim for relief. Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 619, as amended (Code Ann. § 81A-108); Harper v. DeFreitas, 117 Ga. App. 236 (1) (160 SE2d 260); see also Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (1) (161 SE2d 281).
2. Where a motion for summary judgment is overruled and the case proceeds to trial and where the evidence introduced at the trial authorizes the verdict on this same issue, any possible error in overruling the motion for summary judgment is harmless. Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (2), supra.
3. The trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hill v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Harper v. DeFreitasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Emory University v. ShadburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- HOSPITAL AUTHORITY &C. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Central Railroad v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF AUGUSTA, INC. v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Deese v. Carroll City County HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Clark v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968