Legal Opinion

Meade v. Roberts

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., J.

Defendant has moved for leave' to serve an amended answer so as to assert a cross claim against the plaintiff Eunice R. Meade for the apportionment of any recovery which may be obtained against defendant by plaintiff’s infant son, Russell Meade.

This action, which presently is No. 98 on the Trial Term Calendar of the Broome County Supreme Court, arises out of a two-car collision which occurred on August 17, 1964 when vehicles owned and operated by the plaintiff Eunice R. Meade and defendant John E. Roberts collided at an intersection. As a result of that collision,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sorrentino v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  2. Yarish v. DowlingNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Sanchez v. Hertz Rental Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lastowski v. Norge Coin-O-Matic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Liebman v. County of WestchesterNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lastowski v. Norge Coin-O-Matic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Rose v. ThauNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API