Justice Court v. People Ex Rel. Harvey

specially concurring.

I agree with the opinion of the court on the ground indicated in the opinion, but feel that the judgment should also be reversed on the question of residence.

Counsel for plaintiffs in error poses the question as follows: .“What sort of a.residence of a defendant within the precinct, meets the requirements of the statute?” The'.trial court, found on conflicting: evidence that the Harveys were residents of Precinct No. 3, while I think it should have found, as a matter of law, that they were residents of Precinct No. 1,’ in which they were served. We have repeatedly held…