Bailey v. Hill
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from, decree of chancery court of city of Richmond, rendered November 4th, 1880, in two suits pending therein, entitled&emdash;-the one, Bailey (M. C.), ivho sues for, &c. v. Hill and others, and the other, Bailey (J. M., Jr.), v. Pizzini and als. M. G. Bailey held, hy her hushand, A. M. Bailey, as trustee, a house and lot in Richmond, occupied by them, and inherited from her brother.
Read the full summary
Appeal from, decree of chancery court of city of Richmond, rendered November 4th, 1880, in two suits pending therein, entitled&emdash;-the one, Bailey (M. C.), ivho sues for, &c. v. Hill and others, and the other, Bailey (J. M., Jr.), v. Pizzini and als. M. G. Bailey held, hy her hushand, A. M. Bailey, as trustee, a house and lot in Richmond, occupied by them, and inherited from her brother. The trust terms were: The trustee to hold and manage the property for the sole, and separate use and disposal of said Mary O. Bailey, free from the debts, control and marital rights of her said husband,…
1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.
Under the post nuptial settlement of January 31st, 1866, the real estate is to he held by the wife during her life, under its provisions, the trustee to reinvest if the same shall he sold. The trustee pending the transactions, the subject of litigation here, was the husband of the appellant, Mary O. Bailey. The wife and the trustee made a trust deed, conveying the property to secure a debt of $3,800, and these suits are brought by Mrs. Bailey and her children respectively, to prevent the sale of the said property under the deed.
The chancery court dissolved the injunction by decree of that…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kessel v. CohenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- Christian & Gunn v. KeenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
- John v. ElkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. Fox's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Norris v. WoodsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.