Legal Opinion
United States v. Regan
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 19, 2000No. CRIMA9910219-WGYPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, Chief Judge.
Following a bench trial before our Chief Magistrate Judge, Terrence T. Regan (“Regan”) was found guilty of violating a federal regulation that prohibits presence in a national park while under the influence of alcohol to a degree that may endanger oneself, another person, or park property. See 36 C.F.R. § 2.35(c) (1999) (the “Regulation”). 1 Regan challenges his conviction on two grounds. First, he argues that the verdict and judgment were not supported by the evidence. Second, Regan claims .that the Regulation is unconstitutionally vague.
I. SUFFICIENCY…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wilma Cumpiano A/K/A Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez v. Banco Santander Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. KeyesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009