Suell v. United States
District Court, S.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to file under seal. (Doc. 100). Attached to the motion, filed under seal, are all 547 pages of exhibits on which the plaintiffs rely in support of their motion for partial summary judgment. The only ground offered in support of the motion is that the submitted documents are subject to a protective order entered by the Magistrate Judge at the parties’ joint request.
Protective orders are contemplated by Rule 26(c) as a tool for managing discovery. Among other possible subjects, a protective order may “requir[e]…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Greg Rushford, the Washington Post Company, Intervenor v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc., and William Shawn Reneta AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Michael D. Van Etten v. Bridgestone/Firestone, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Virginia Gambale v. Deutsche Bank Ag, Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Theriot v. Nw. Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019
- SPORT & WHEAT CPA PA v. SERVISFIRST BANK INC.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2020
- Sandy Bay Oyster Co., Inc., et al. v. Carter’s Contracting Services, Inc., et al.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2026
- Seals v. AistrupDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021