Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dianne Craig, Claimant-Appellant v. M/v Peacock, on the Complaint of Oscko Edwards, Harry M. Tompkins, Fairfield Industries

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1985No. 83-2023Published

1DissentWisdom, Senior Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The majority decision in this case does a serious injustice to scientific personnel serving on oceanographic vessels. Seamen-scientists serving as members of an ORV crew may, at times, be exposed to greater perils of the sea than are traditional seamen. Here, for example, Larry Lewis, a member of the scientific personnel of the crew of the PEACOCK, while engaged in repairing seismic survey equipment, fell overboard at a place on the PEACOCK where the guard rails had been removed for convenience in handling scientific equipment. Yet, the majority affirmed: the trier of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API