Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Morrisey Walker, Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 11, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this cause is filed for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. The matter is submitted on the pleadings and an agreed state of facts. The agreement which is sought to be enforced is between the complainants, executors and trustees of the will of Michael Murphy, who died a resident of, and domiciled in, Montgomery county, Pennsylvania, on March 10th, 1917, as vendors, and the defendant as vendee. This will was duly probated in that county. The agreed state of facts shows tender of performance by complainants and refusal by defendant, such refusal being based…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McGill v. Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  2. Hewitt v. GreenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
  3. Graves v. GravesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  4. Morse v. Hackensack Savings BankNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
  5. Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Swetland v. SwetlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. In Re JohnstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1940
  3. Reiner v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  4. The Pennsylvania Co., C. v. RobbNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  5. Cutts v. NajdrowskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API