Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Aiken v. Home Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 7, 1926No. 12078Published
1Concurrence
Mr. Acting Associate Justice Marion
(concurring): I think the result reached is consistent with, if not absolutely required by, the construction of the statute adopted by this Court in Columbia Real Estate & Trust Co. v. Royal Exchange Assurance Company, 132 S. C., 427, 128 S. E., 865, and in Parnell v. Insurance Company, 126 S. C., 198; 119 S. E., 191; 32 A. L. R., 648. I therefore concur in the result of Mr. Justice Purdy’s opinion.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Columbia Real Estate & Trust Co. v. Royal Exchange AssuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Parnell v. Orient Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923