Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Aiken v. Home Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 7, 1926No. 12078Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Acting Associate Justice Marion

(concurring): I think the result reached is consistent with, if not absolutely required by, the construction of the statute adopted by this Court in Columbia Real Estate & Trust Co. v. Royal Exchange Assurance Company, 132 S. C., 427, 128 S. E., 865, and in Parnell v. Insurance Company, 126 S. C., 198; 119 S. E., 191; 32 A. L. R., 648. I therefore concur in the result of Mr. Justice Purdy’s opinion.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbia Real Estate & Trust Co. v. Royal Exchange AssuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Parnell v. Orient Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923