Legal Opinion

Lee v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 1963No. 14205PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Justice.

On September 8, 1961, appellee filed her amended statement pursuant to Rule 187, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, seeking to perpetuate the testimony of certain named witnesses. The amended statement was filed because the trial court had held the original statement to be insufficient and had enjoined the taking of depositions. At the time of filing the amended statement, appellee filed her petition to dissolve the injunction theretofore granted. Appellant opposed such petition, but the trial court, after a hearing, dissolved the injunction. Appellant appealed to this Court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. State ex rel. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Equitable Trust Co. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Ramsey v. GardnerTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Lee v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office Employees International Union Local 277 v. Southwestern Drug Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Southwestern Drug Corp. v. Office Employees International Union Local 277Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API