Legal Opinion

Pulaski Anthracite Coal Co. v. Gibboney Sand Bar Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 18, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to a judgment of the' Circuit Court of Pulaski county in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

The defendant in error brought this action against plaintiff in error, and recovered a verdict and judgment for $1,000 damages, alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the deposit of slack, slate, culm and mine refuse in and along the banks of New river from the defendant’s coal mine, which slack, etc., it is alleged, was carried down the river and thrown upon the sand bar of the plaintiff, situated on the east side of New river three and one-half miles below the mine of the defendant.

The declaration claimed that the plaintiff owned the said sand bar; that it contained a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Missouri v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Swain v. Tennessee Copper Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Little Schuylkill Navigation, Railroad & Coal Co. v. Richards's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Southern Express Co. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. Virginia & North Carolina Wheel Co. v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Talley v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Masonite Corp. v. BurnhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Farley v. Crystal Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Arminius Chemical Co. v. LandrumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ElsingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API