Legal Opinion

In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter originated in this Court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “Commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (A)(1)(b) and Div. (A)(2)(d). The Commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1996-1997 reporting period.

On November 18, 1998, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (B)(1), this Court issued to the respondent an order to show cause why the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. AmesOhio Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API