Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Gatison

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1990No. A90A2127PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

Defendants Marshall and Smith appeal the denial of their motion to traverse service. Although styled a “motion to traverse service,” the motion sought to vacate a judgment entered for plaintiff on March 23, 1989. Defendants enumerate as error the failure of the trial court to vacate the March 23 judgment and argue that because of the failure to properly serve Smith the court lacked jurisdiction and the judg*371ment was void and cannot stand.

Decided October 24, 1990. William A. Wehunt, for appellants. Hiles & Rowen, Sharon L. Rowen, John E. Klonoski, for appellee.

The substance of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Ko v. Habersham Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lolita Yagnik v. Palisades Collection, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. Thompson Law, LLC v. Tbf Financial, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API