Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roy v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided September 11, 1991No. 05-89-00793-CRPublished

1DissentBaker, Justice

I dissent. While I agree with the majority’s disposition of points of error three and ten that the admission of the uncertified *544pen packets was error, I would also sustain appellant’s seventh point of error.

The majority holds that it was not error for the trial court to admit the hearsay testimony that the Dallas County Residential Center was a penal institution. I disagree. Hearsay is hearsay. In its hopscotch efforts to find the testimony admissible, the majority fabricates a basis for the evidentiary leap the State failed to make at trial. I cannot agree.

DEFINITIONS

We must first return to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Schaffer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. McWilliams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Legg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API