Legal Opinion

In re Mellen's Estate

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from surrogate’s court, New York county. Appeal by Sarah E. Mellen, as administratrix of Abner Mellen, Jr., ¡accountant, from a decree of the surrogate upon the judicial settlement ■of Abner Mellen, Jr.’s, accounts as one of the executors of the will of Abner Mellen, deceased. Affirmed. For reports of other litigation involving this estate, see 9 N. Y. Supp. 929; 16 N. Y. Supp. 3 91, 887; 17 N. Y. Supp. 866; 18 N. Y. Supp. 515, 937, mem.; 19 N. Y. Supp. 1001.

1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, J.

The contest in the surrogate’s court was confined chiefly to the liability of the accountant to his father’s estate for a sum ■of $77,000, represented by nine promissory notes. These notes were given by the accountant to his father in exchange for a single demand ■note for $77,000. This demand note represented the accountant’s indebtedness to the firm of Mellen & Co., composed of himself, his father, and one Taylor; and this indebtédness was, upon the delivery ■of such demand note, transferred or charged to the account of Mr. Mellen, Sr., who was the capitalist of the concern. The present…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loder v. . WhelpleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Snyder v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mellen v. BanningNew York Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API