Legal Opinion

In re Rowand

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 23, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 75-549PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals affirming the rejections of claims 6-10, all the claims in application serial No. 61,417, filed August 5, 1970, for reissue of appellants’ Patent No. 3,166,688, issued January 19, 1965, entitled “Polytetrafluoroethylene Tubing Having Electrically Conductive Properties.” The application is a division of application serial No. 802,295, filed February 14, 1969, for reissue of the same patent. The rejections were made under 35 U.S.C. §§ 251, 102, 103, and under the doctrine of interference…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. In re ClarkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  3. In re DeJarlaisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. In Re Leslie N. Wilder, James C. Whitney and Gary G. Matison, and Lanier Business Products, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. In Re Elmar W. Weiler and Richard L. MansellCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Dethmers Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
  5. In Re Godfrey Newbold HounsfieldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API