Legal Opinion

Peden v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2006No. 05-17PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶ 1] In November 2004, the district court sentenced Dale Peden (the appellant) for felony conspiracy to deliver methamphetamine. The appellant now appeals that sentence, claiming that the district court improperly considered prior uncharged criminal activity at sentencing. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] Whether the district court abused its discretion when it sentenced the appellant?

FACTS

[¶ 3] The appellant was initially charged with two felonies: 1) conspiracy to deliver methamphetamine in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 35-7-1031(a)(i) and 35-7-1042 (Lex-isNexis 2005); and 2)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Steven Keith Hatch v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. James Michael WiseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Darrell BeaulieuCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McGillArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Andrew William DeedsWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Santana Mendoza v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Capellen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Henry R. Sanchez v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API