Legal Opinion

Amgen Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 23, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (board), denying the applications of Amgen Inc. (Amgen), for abatement of the Massachusetts excise on foreign corporations doing business in Massachusetts. Amgen argues that its activities' in the Commonwealth during the years in question1 do not subject it to the excise, as provided in G. L. c. 63, § 39. Amgen relies on a Federal statute, Pub. L. 86-272, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 381 (1994), that prohibits a State from imposing an excise on foreign corporations whose only business activities involve the solicitation of certain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Heublein, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Koch v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Commissioner of Revenue v. Houghton Mifflin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Blue Buffalo v. ComptrollerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Alcoa Building Products, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Schering-Plough Healthcare Products Sales Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API