Legal Opinion

United States v. Kinzer

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 20, 1951No. Civ. A. 1131-49PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEECH, District Judge.

This case is before the court on a motion for new trial, filed and argued subsequent to the defendant’s conviction of housebreaking and larceny.

■ The first trial of the defendant under the same indictment resulted in a hung jury. Prior to the second trial the defendant’s attorney filed a motion in forma pauperis to obtain the entire transcript of the proceedings of the first trial at government expense, which was heard and denied by the judge who presided at the first trial. During the second trial, the defendant’s attorney, in view of the previous denial of his motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Ewing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. May v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bacon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  2. William Estep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. John Reid v. Phillip Charney and Howard LeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. Magee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Harold W. Greenwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API