Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Forgione

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 2, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

' Barnes, J.

Bill in equity to relieve certain real estate of encumbrance by way of mortgage, by virtue of a clause of partial release incorporated in the mortgage.

Complainant is a mortgagee of a grantee of the grantor of the mortgage which contains the clause of partial release.

The real estate is known as Lot 19.

Forgione, one of the respondents, on November 20, 1923, mort*67gaged to the Gorham Savings Bank a large tract of land, divided into lots of which Lot 19 was one, to secure the payment of $11,000.00, payable on demand, in which mortgage was the following provision: “It is hereby made a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Clarke v. CowanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Fulton v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Rugg v. RecordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dimeo v. EllensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Friedlander v. Hiram Ricker & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Friedlander v. Hiram Ricker & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API