Maluf v. Bergelectric Corp
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** Jorge E. Ordonez Maluf, 8 Case No. 2:23-cv-00115-CDS-VCF Plaintiff, 9 vs. Report and Recommendation 10 Bergelectric Corp, et al., And 11 Defendant. Order 12 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY REPRESENTATION (ECF 13 NO. 7); AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 8) 14 15 I previously screened and dismissed pro se plaintiff Jorge E. Ordonez Maluf’s claims for 16 violations of (1) the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931; (2) the Copeland Act of 1934; and (3) the Rehabilitation 17 Act of 1973 without prejudice. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint and a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.