Legal Opinion

Samuel Britt v. Elwood S. McKenney

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 23, 1976No. 75--1279PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge.

On this appeal five plaintiff appellants seek to maintain a class action for a declaratory judgment to the effect that Massachusetts criminal defendants who are unable to afford stenographers or other means to record the testimony at probable cause hearings, Mass. G.L. c. 276, §§ 38, 42, have been constitutionally deprived by the Commonwealth’s failure to create a transcript. They are faced at the outset with a claim that jurisdiction for declaratory relief does not exist. If none of the named plaintiffs may maintain this action on their own behalf, they may not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gross v. Summa Four, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Robert Brennan v. Michael J. Cunningham, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Doe v. the GovernorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Paulinski v. IsaacSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local v. Danske BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API