Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Mitchell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1884No. 11,365PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Colerick, C.

This action was instituted -by the appellee against the appellant, and Edmund R. Bowman, her husband, to foreclose a mortgage executed by them upon certain real estate, in Henry county, Indiana, and given to secure the payment of the purchase-money therefor, which was evidenced by certain notes executed by Edmund R. Bowman alone. The appellant filed a separate answer to the com>plaint, averring that after the execution of the mortgage, the payee of the notes “ unlawfully, and without the knowledge of this defendant, fraudulently altered and changed the notes,” by inserting therein…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kissel v. EatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bowman v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Baker v. McCuneIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Baker v. McCuneIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brunson v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Butler v. ThornburghIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Simmons v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Leonard v. BinfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API