Legal Opinion

A. Miller & Bro. v. Hahn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Civil ActioN of claim and delivery tried at Spring Term, 1880, of CraveN Superior'Court, before Gudger, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Skith, G. S.

The mare, the ownership of which is the subject of controversy, belonged to Calvin Herring, under whom both parties claim.

1. The plaintiffs produced in evidence a hill of sale bearing the signatures of Calvin Herring and of a subscribing witness, already proved and registered,- and in proof of execution, was permitted, on objection, to show that the subscribing witness was dead and the maker out of the state, and that the names of each affixed to the instrument were in their own proper hand-writing respectively. The witness also testified that he was present and saw each of them…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holmes, Ex'r v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. . HahnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Richardson v. Chicago & Alton RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Hall v. . TillmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API