Legal Opinion

Iaia v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Hughes, J.

Plaintiff insureds commenced this action after their residence burned due to an electrical system failure and the defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford) refused to pay more than half of the loss, claiming that pursuant to Insurance Law § 3425, defendants Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company and Utica Mutual Insurance Company and its affiliates, the Utica National Insurance Group (Graphic Arts), did not effectively terminate an earlier policy and were, therefore, liable for the other half. The Hartford’s insurance policy is the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Zack Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Victor v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Otsego Mutual Fire Insurance v. Hartford Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API