Legal Opinion

Judkins v. Exeter & Hampton Electric Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 1, 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The plaintiff bases his right to recover on the fact that he was not notified when he went to work on this pole that the current was on the high-tension wires.

It is the duty of an employer to notify his employees of all the dangers peculiar to the employment of which he either knows or ought to know, and of which they neither know nor are in fault for not knowing. If, therefore,, it is found that the plaintiff neither knew nor was not in fault for not knowing, when he climbed the pole, that the high-tension wires were charged, it can be found that he was injured by the negligence of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paige v. M. T. Stevens & Son's Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  2. Stowe v. PayneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API