Caplan v. Johnson

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Appellant complains that the Court’s decision is based on an erroneous conception of the facts, and that there are no facts which show that any false arrest or imprisonment by any of the persons against whom plaintiffs obtained their original judgment are covered by appellant’s policy of insurance. Let us again look at the record to see if these contentions are justified.

Garnishment against Lloyds for collection of the judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs arose out of the issuance by Lloyds of a policy of false arrest insurance in favor of the Town of Medley,…