Legal Opinion

Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 26, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-0776Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-776 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 9, 14 : ALEX M. AZAR, II, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CROSS- MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (“ISDEAA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 5301–5423, authorizes the federal government and Indian tribes to enter into contracts that permit the tribes to provide to their members federally funded services…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  3. Thomas R. Sherwood v. The Washington PostCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. Muscogee (Creek) Nation, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe v. Donald Hodel, Secretary, U.S. Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. Ethyl Corporation v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API