Legal Opinion

Wissman v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1983No. Appeals, Nos. 2977 C.D. 1981, 2978 C.D. 1981, 2979 C.D. 1981, 2980 C.D. 1981, 2981 C.D. 1981, 2982 C.D. 1981 and 2983 C.D. 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The seven appellants in these unemployment compensation cases which we have consolidated were discharged from their employment with the Bensalem Township Public Works Department for the use of narcotics and dangerous drugs during working hours.

The appellants were declared eligible for unemployment compensation benefits by the Office of Employment Security. The employer appealed these decisions, and separate hearings were held by a referee. At each of these hearings, the employer’s principal witness was an undercover agent who, for approximately three months, posed as a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grcich v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Boulware v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API